To test the hypothesis that the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. Loftus department of psychology, university of washington, seattle, washington 981951525, usa abstract. The influence of the wording of a question elizabeth f. Eyewitness testimony with a new preface book also available for read online, mobi, docx and mobile and kindle reading. Research and courtroom experience provide ample evidence that an eyewitness to a crime is being asked to be something and do something that a normal human being was not created to be or do. Eyewitness testimony is a form of evidence used in the court systems. Psychological research and legal thought abstract most psychological studies of eyewitness testimony conducted during this century are aimed at discovering factors influencing the accuracy and completeness of an eyewitness account, with emphasis.
Eyewitness testimony and memory distortion 7 misinformation do not provide evidence for impairment of prior traces. Email citation an awardwinning book that describes the authors empirical studies of eyewitnesses as well as other works around at the time. Supreme court recognized this danger, but the tests it promulgated to distinguish reliable from unre liable eyewitness testimony were based largely on surmise. This measures the difference in responses in the smashed and bumped condition after participants are subjected to reading a passage describing a accident. Baron university ofiowa, iowa city, iowa 52242 recently, loftus and her associates have demonstrated that the ability of subjects to. Many researchers in the field of eyewitness testimony appear to take the existence of weapon focus for granted. For example, subjects who do not remember some event detail say, a. Harvard university press revised edition of 1979 book. Probably only a suspects signed confession can further convince a jury about that individuals guilt. Loftuss research has focused on eyewitness testimony, and she has published extensively on both its psychological and legal aspects. One important application of research into memory is eyewitness testimony ewt. Summary the study of eyewitness testimony is thriving.
Elizabeth loftus, a pioneering psychologist, made a landmark contribution to both these areas in eyewitness testimony, a trailblazing work that undermines much of the decisionmaking made by judges and juries by pointing out how flawed eyewitness testimony actually is. Eyewitness testimony article pdf available in the american journal of psychology 934. Japanese psychological research 1996, volume 38, no. By shedding light on the many factors that can intervene and create inaccurate testimony, elizabeth loftus illustrates how memory can be radically altered by the way an eyewitness is questioned, and how new memories can be implanted and old ones changed in subtle ways. An awardwinning book that describes the authors empirical studies of eyewitnesses as well as other works around at the time. They aimed to show that the cues within leading questions could distort eyewitness testimony accounts. For example they may be required to give a description at a trial of a robbery or a road accident someone has seen. I ask the students to consider how difficult it might be to recall a scene in which a crime may have occurred. It is shown that when the initial question contains either true. Pdf eyewitness testimony ebooks includes pdf, epub and.
Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander or victim gives in the courtroom, describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. The fallibility of eyewitness testimony and its impact on the justice system has become a hot topic in. Thus, they aimed to show that leading questions could distort eyewitness testimony accounts and so have a confabulating effect, as the account would become distorted by cues provided in the question. She presents a lot of excellent information about eyewitness testimony in this book including eyewitness identification of suspects, which is related to memory issue. Over the last three decades, psychologists have made important discoveries, and applied those discoveries to the legal system in myriad ways. Eyewitness testimony and memory biases by cara laney and elizabeth f. Demand and the impact of leading questions on eyewitness. Both the discrimination and the overbelief rationales make two fundamental claims. The influence of the wording of a question article pdf available in bulletin of the psychonomic society 51. Elizabeth f loftus at university of california, irvine elizabeth. It refers to an account given by people of an event they have witnessed.
To test their hypothesis that the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory thus, they aimed to show that leading questions could distort eyewitness testimony accounts and so have a confabulating effect, as the account would become distorted by cues provided in the question. Inaccurate eyewitness testimony is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. Memory is not the only process that affects eyewitness testimony. Loftus university of washington, seattle, washington 98195 and guido zanni new school for social research, new york, new york 10011 two experiments are reported in which subjects viewed a film of.
Eyewirness tesrimony eyewitness testimony and memory distortion charles g. Without eyewitness testimony, 18% of jurors convicted him. Eyewitness testimony loftus 2019 applied cognitive. Loftus university of washington, seattle, washington 98195 and guido zanni new school for social research, new york, new york 10011 two experiments are reported in which subjects viewed a film of an automobile accident and then. Understanding evidence is critical in a court of law and it is just as important for critical thinking. Abajos university of the basque country, san sebastia. Loftus, i remember you trying to discredit every single victim of sexual abuse that crossed your line. Psychology cognitive psychology memory eyewitness testimony psychology. The fallibility of eyewitness testimony and its impact on the justice system has become a. This includes identification of perpetrators, details of the crime scene etc. For this reason, much previous research has investigated the effects of. Because jurors tend to find eyewitness testimony compelling and persuasive, it is argued that jurors are likely to give inappropriate credence to eyewitness testimony, judging it to be reliable when it is not. Aug 20, 2018 eyewitness testimony is historically among the most convincing forms of evidence in criminal trials e.
In eyewitness testimony, elizabeth loftus makes the psychological case against the eyewitness. To test their hypothesis that the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. The intractability of inaccurate eyewitness identification. Download book pdf introducing psychological research pp 305309 cite as. When eyewitness testimony was added, 72% of jurors convicted him.
She has also investigated the issue of the accuracy of memories formed in childhood and the possibility of recovery later in life of memories of traumatic events that had apparently been repressed. A total of 490 subjects, in four experiments, saw films of complex, fastmoving events, such as automobile accidents or classroom disruptions. In 1975 loftus set a legal precedent when she provided washington states first expert testimony about eyewitness memory specifically, on the topic of eyewitness identification. Human perception is sloppy and uneven, albeit remarkably effective in. Demand character istics and response biases could readily lead subjects to perform more poorly in the face of misinformation. Since jurors rarely regard eyewitness testimony with any skepticism, the expert testimony will increase the likelihood of this happening. It was found that jurors who hear about a violent crime are more likely to convict a defendant than of one from a nonviolent crime. This is a superb sourcebook on eyewitness identification evidence. Loftus conducted more experiments to prove the reliability of expert psychological testimony versus the accepted basic eyewitness testimony.
Leading questions and the eyewitness report semantic scholar. Loftus frse born elizabeth fishman, october 16, 1944 is an american cognitive psychologist and expert on human memory. Mar 12, 2019 the study of eyewitness testimony is thriving. Loftus and palmer believed that leading questions could affect recall in those asked to provide eyewitness testimony, and their particular aim was to test whether leading questions would affect recall of the speed of a car and cause people to misremember other details particularly the presence of broken glass during a traffic accident. Pdf eyewitness testimony download full pdf book download. Eyewitness testimony psychology oxford bibliographies. After getting a few opinions, i explain the memory challenge slides 34.
Baron university ofiowa, iowa city, iowa 52242 recently, loftus and her associates have demonstrated that the ability of subjects to respond accurately to questioning about an event they witnessed can be systematically. The purpose of these experiments was to investigate how the wording of questions asked immediately after an event may influence responses to questions asked considerably later. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness point of view. Indeed, many witnesses to an offence, both adults and children, can remember events with enough clarity and accuracy to assist triersoffact in rendering a verdict. Next, i explain to the students that in order to provide a good eyewitness testimony, people have to concentrate heavily on what they were able to see and recall. Loftus findings seem to indicate that memory for an event that has been witnessed is highly flexible. Eyewitnesses can provide very compelling legal testimony, but rather than recording experiences flawlessly, their memories are susceptible to a variety of errors and biases. Jan 31, 1980 elizabeth loftus is a memory researcher.
But i have long been arguing that eyewitness testimony arises not only in these important. It relies on heavily on the memory of the eyewitness person who saw an event and until elizabeth loftus and colleagues started considering the reliability of memory, the court system assumed that the memory of eyewitnesses was highly accurate. Thanks to elizabeth loftus, rebecca milne, don thomson and aldert vrij for feedback. Supreme court recognized this danger, but the tests it promulgated to distinguish reliable from unre liable eyewitness testimony were based largely on. Assessing the knowledge and beliefs of students studying policing. Eyewitness testimony should be admissible in court, but it should be admitted with caution and with an understanding that there are certain factors such as weapon focus and compromised memories which can reduce the reliability of eyewitness. By shedding light on the many factors that can intervene and create inaccurate testimony, elizabeth loftus illustrates how memory can be. Along the way, there were disagreements, which were typically healthy in nature. Well, one of the things that we know about juries and how they react to evidence that theyre hearing is that they do place a lot of weight in eyewitness testimony. By shedding light on the many factors that can intervene and create inaccurate testimony, elizabeth loftus illustrates how memory can be radically altered by the way an eyewitness is questioned, and how new memories can be implanted and old ones changed in. Beginning with the basics of eyewitness fallibility, such as poor viewing conditions, brief exposure, and stress, loftus moves to more subtle factors, such as expectations, biases, and personal stereotypes, all of which can intervene to create. Over the last three decades, psychologists have made important discoveries, and.
Eyewitness testimony loftus 2019 applied cognitive psychology. Download eyewitness testimony with a new preface in pdf and epub formats for free. That iconic moment when a testifying witness points to the defendant as the. The research conducted by loftus and palmer is very interesting, and does make you question whether the eyewitness testimony is a reliable method to use eyewitness testimony loftus pdf. The effect is commonly called the misinformation effect. Elizabeth f loftus at university of california, irvine. New research reveals how little we can trust eyewitnesses. She has conducted research on the malleability of human memory. Loftus and palmer 1974 eyewitness testimony psych yogi. Loftus is best known for her groundbreaking work on the misinformation effect and eyewitness memory, and the creation and nature of false memories, including recovered memories of childhood. Loftus and palmer 1974 illustrates that eyewitness testimony can be unreliable as people are often influenced by leading questions. In a study that examined the power of eyewitness testimony, mock jurors heard an armed bank robbery case which resulted in two deaths loftus, 1975.
598 1330 995 1558 1225 1001 1451 1585 1418 591 1000 502 839 1583 805 1393 1371 461 1033 754 1479 24 1222 532 1395 1219 374 1333 168 955